I know this is a somewhat rather late weigh-in on the argument as it seems to have died down on the internet but I thought I'd give my ten pence anyway.
Rumours have been snaking around the internet that Anna
Wintour is to be approached by Barack Obama for the position of US ambassador to
the UK. Wintour’s publicist has outright denied that she would take up such an
offer in the unlikely event she was offered it. However, regardless of this
many have been speculating about whether or not Wintour is a suitable candidate
for the position.
Anna Wintour is arguably the most powerful person in the global $200
billion fashion industry today. In her 24-year career as editor-in-chief
of US Vogue, she has engineered some very successful business and fashion partnerships.
The documentary ‘The September Issue’ showed the blossoming Thakoon and Gap
relationship, put together by Wintour who singled out the young designer for
the position. She has also raised substantial amounts of money for charity and
over $500,000 for Obama’s re-election fund. Furthermore, in an age where many
are mourning the death of the printed word and many newspapers and magazines
are struggling to gain a decent readership, Wintour has pushed Vogue to the
very forefront of fashion publishing.
Nile Gardiner, of The Telegraph, was quite spiteful in the
way in which he talked about fashion and dismissed Anna Wintour as merely part
of Obama’s ‘obsession with celebrities’. Wintour is not the celebrity face on
the front of the magazine as Gardiner woefully dismisses. Instead, she is the
woman behind it. The driving force that keeps Vogue as one of the world’s most
successful fashion magazines and has a considerable influence in the careers of
both established and up-and-coming fashion designers. It seems Gardiner expects
Wintour to take on the persona of her supposed Devil Wears Prada alter ego Miranda Priestly with the headline ‘the
Special Relationship is not a fashion statement’. I imagine the only reaction
Miranda Priestly-esque reaction Wintour would have to that wholly patronising
headline is a dismissing roll of the eyes.
However, dealing with business issues does not necessarily
translate well into dealing with important diplomatic issues, which is the
central role of a US ambassador. ‘A Rose in the Desert’ was the headline of a
3,000 word glowing report of the Asma al-Assad, first lady of Assad’s murderous
Syrian regime, printed by Vogue in march 2011. Many consider this mistake to
have blighted Wintour’s chances at the post and would be a shady point in the
unlikely event she were offered it. Fortunately, Vogue later distanced itself
from the deplorable Assad regime and the article was pulled from their website.
However, somebody in such an instrumental diplomatic position, as the US
ambassador to the UK would be, cannot afford to make a mistake like this.
Ultimately, I think Anna Wintour is unsuitable for the
position of US ambassador to the UK because of her lack of political experience,
and on this basis only. Her position as a powerful business woman simply cannot
be disputed and I want to tear my hair out when I read online articles in
relation to this issue that belittle her for the position purely on the basis
of her role in the ‘seemingly pointless’ fashion business.
Hey ! lovely blog! check out mine if you can and want :)
ReplyDeletehttp://wildhearttts.blogspot.com.es/